Disclosure of job interview breached privacy

03 May 2021

We are sharing a ruling by the Privacy Commissioner. 

The complainant resigned from his job and attended a job interview with the company during his notice period.  He expressly told the interview panel that he did not want them to contact his current employer.  The complainant subsequently learned that a person from the interview panel had a discussion with the complainant’s Manager shortly after the interview.

The complainant submitted a formal complaint to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (the Office) that there had been a disclosure of information in breach of principle 11 of the Privacy Act 2020.  Principle 11 states that an agency that holds personal information shall not disclose the information unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds, that one of the exceptions applies.

The company advised the Office that the person from the interview panel had a close friendship with the complainant’s Manager and that she had simply met with the complainant.  The company did not offer the complainant a position as his experience was not as wide as the company required.  The company advised that the decision was made before the discussion with his Manager.  The complainant’s Manager recalled that the person from the interview panel had told him that the complainant had interviewed for a position.  The Office found that the person from the interview panel had provided the context for meeting the complainant and that they had interviewed the complainant for a position.  Therefore, the Office found that there had been a breach of principle 11.

For there to be an interference with privacy, there must be a breach of a principle and harm resulting from the breach.  Harm can include significant injury to feelings.  The complainant advised that when he discovered that the person from the interview panel had spoken with his Manager about the interview, he felt extremely worried, upset, and anxious.  He was concerned that his Manager had given him a poor reference as he had been experiencing a difficult job situation.

The Office decided that the feelings experienced by the complainant met the threshold for harm.  The Office was guided by the decision in Winter v Jans, where the Human Rights Review Tribunal found that injury to feelings could include anxiety and stress.

The Office facilitated a settlement of the complaint and closed the file.

 

Legal Team

 

David Browne | Senior Solicitor/Legal Team Manager | 03 456 1812 | 021 225 6938 | david@osea.org.nz

Persia Templeton | Senior Solicitor | 0508 656 757 | persia@osea.org.nz 

Dr Kathryn McAuley | Solicitor | 03 456 1813 | 021 197 4603 | kathryn@osea.org.nz

Libby Fraser | Advocate | 03 455 5165 

Copyright 2021 | Otago Southland Employers' Association | All Rights Reserved | Website by Punch Marketing